STAUPELL ANALYTICS GROUP - ANALYTICS EXPERTS FOR NONPROFITS, IMPROVING FUNDRAISING
  • Home
  • About
    • Staupell Team
    • Testimonials
    • Partnerships >
      • Prospect Research Institute
      • Lityx
      • TouchPoints
      • Gravyty
  • Services
    • Fundraising Analytics
    • Prospect Development
    • Business Intelligence
    • Database Administration
    • Fundraising Optimization Solution
  • Training
    • Analytics Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Intelligence Visualization Reporting
    • Prospect Research and Management
    • Webinars
    • Classes >
      • Beginner Analytics Using R
      • Analytics Classes
      • Skill Builder Series
    • Workbooks
  • Blog
  • Events
    • Water Cooler Chats
    • Video Replays
  • Contact
  • Product

Driven by Data Blog

RFM And Major Gift Modeling

12/14/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
This blog post explores using a popular measure, RFM (explained below), as a modeling tool. There is some debate about its use in modeling major gifts, and so I share my thoughts here. If you have used RFM to measure your prospect giving behaviors, let us know at marianne@staupell.com.

Defining RFM
Recency, frequency, and monetary value is a collection of measurements used by data mining firms to asses a customer’s potential. Called RFM, this tool looks for a company’s highest value clients.

Recency refers to how recent the prospect’s latest gift arrived. Frequency refers to how many gifts or pledges have been given by the prospect over a period of time, usually five years. Monetary value if the total value of each gift or pledge.

Put together as a 3-number score, RFM shows the pattern of donor behavior. All of the values for each of these 3 segments are sorted into 5 bins, resulting in scores that range from 111 (lowest of all 3 scores) to 555. The resulting segments are often used to sort prospects into the annual giving, planned giving, and major gift programs.

Using RFM: How Nonprofits Differ from For-Profit Firms
In fundraising, we have to remember that our prices, unlike, say, Coca Cola, are widely varied. To buy a Coke, I might pay $1.00 for a 12-ounce can, or as much as $10.00 for a case (my Coke purchase prices may be way out of date, my apologies). In fund-raising, however, our price varies from a $25 starting annual fund gift to a $500 million top level campaign gift. We can not measure donor behavior in the same way that Coke measures our purchases.

The other concept to keep in mind is that major gifts prospects make pledges rather than give cash gifts and through multi-year pledges. The old adage that major gifts come from assets and annual fund gifts come from the checkbook/credit card still holds for most gifts.

Managing the Interval Problem
Given their nature, major gifts show a gap in the recency and frequency measurements, if the downloaded gift data shows pledges and outright gifts only. If the gift data, instead, shows pledge payments and outright gifts, then the recency and frequency scores would improve.
Annual fund donors, however, can give by credit card every month. That leaves their recency and frequency scores much higher than major gifts donors who are making annual pledge payments with occasional annual fund or special purpose gifts.

Using RFM in Development
One method I would suggest for using this tool is to both measure it against single pledge payments and outright gifts, making sure that the payment dates are included. This way, one can tell if a higher RFM means an annual fund gift or a major gift.

I would also encourage the analyst to look at each score separately. Would a higher frequency score mean a lower level gift? My studies on this question always resulted in a yes. I have also seen the effect of giveaways (a la public television and radio), where the recency and frequency scores were high for donors up to the highest reward giveaway level, and then drifted off after that.

Does It Work? RFM has its place but is not a panacea for prospecting major gifts prospects. Unless the highest monetary value bin includes major gift-level amounts, RFM is better used to understand annual giving segments. Also, consistent, recent giving by lower-level donors may be indicators of planned giving prospects.

This measurement is certainly one of many of those that we use to try to understand giving. Is an RFM score very different for a radio station membership campaign than for the United Way? I would be curious to know. If you have thoughts on this, please tweet us @Staupell, email us at marianne@staupell.com, or leave a comment below.
1 Comment
Sports News Live link
11/11/2022 02:02:00 am

I'm happy I found this blog. Thank you for sharing with us,I too always learn something new from your post. we provide.We recommend only Korean Toto sites.<a href="https://sportsnewslive.net/">스포츠토토</a>

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Keep Informed
    Sign up for
    notifications when a
    new post comes out

    Sign Up Now


    Authors

    Marianne Pelletier has more than 30 years of experience in fundraising, with the majority in prospect research and prospecting.

    Greg Duke helps Raiser’s Edge clients to optimize their database by implementing data clean-up techniques and creating reporting structures, including dashboards and SQL queries.  He also facilitates data imports into Raiser’s Edge and database administration.

    Categories

    All
    Advancement Svcs
    Annual Giving
    Artificial Intelligence
    Assessment
    Big Data
    Blackbaud
    Branding
    Dashboards
    Databases
    Data Management
    Data Mining
    Data Prep
    Dependent Variables
    Donor Modeling
    Efficiency
    Engagement
    GDPR
    Giving Variables
    Linear Regression
    Machine Learning
    Major Gifts
    NFT
    Participation
    Productivity
    Project Planning
    Prospecting
    Prospect Research
    Push Technology
    Raiser's Edge
    RE NXT
    Reporting
    Research Pride
    RFM
    Statistics

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    March 2021
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    View my profile on LinkedIn
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2023 Staupell Analytics Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • About
    • Staupell Team
    • Testimonials
    • Partnerships >
      • Prospect Research Institute
      • Lityx
      • TouchPoints
      • Gravyty
  • Services
    • Fundraising Analytics
    • Prospect Development
    • Business Intelligence
    • Database Administration
    • Fundraising Optimization Solution
  • Training
    • Analytics Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Intelligence Visualization Reporting
    • Prospect Research and Management
    • Webinars
    • Classes >
      • Beginner Analytics Using R
      • Analytics Classes
      • Skill Builder Series
    • Workbooks
  • Blog
  • Events
    • Water Cooler Chats
    • Video Replays
  • Contact
  • Product